Practices we refuse to bill for
Some marketing line items bill for things that no longer exist. FAQ rich results ended in May 2026. HowTo rich results ended in 2023. Star ratings you mark up about yourself have long been ineligible. And Google says plainly there is no special markup for AI Overviews. Here is each one, with Google's own words.
The record, dated
- Google's changelog: FAQ rich results “will no longer appear in Google Search starting May 7, 2026.” (source, checked 2026-08-28)
- How-to rich results were removed in 2023 — “no longer shown in search results, on both desktop and mobile devices” (September 14, 2023). (source, checked 2026-08-28)
- Pages whose entity controls its own reviews are ineligible for star review features — Google calls this “self-serving” review markup. (source, checked 2026-08-28)
- “You don't need to create new machine readable files, AI text files, or markup to appear in these features. There's also no special schema.org structured data that you need to add.” (source, checked 2026-08-28)
Does FAQ schema still do anything?
No. Google's changelog says the feature “will no longer appear in Google Search starting May 7, 2026” — and for most sites the rich results had already been restricted to government and health sites back in 2023.
The honest nuance: visible FAQ content still helps. People read the answers, and AI engines quote them. What died is the paid “FAQ schema” line item — markup for a display feature that no longer exists.
What happened to How-to rich results?
Google removed them in 2023 — “no longer shown in search results, on both desktop and mobile devices” (changelog note dated September 14, 2023). Any current invoice for How-to markup is billing for a feature retired years ago.
Why don't your own star ratings show in Google?
Because Google rules them out. Reviews controlled by the entity they describe are “self-serving” and ineligible for star review features. Stars you publish about yourself on your own site get you nothing. Your stars belong where they count: your Google Business Profile and third-party review sites.
Is there an AI Overview schema?
No — and this one comes straight from Google: “You don't need to create new machine readable files, AI text files, or markup to appear in these features. There's also no special schema.org structured data that you need to add.”
What Google says does matter: crawlable pages and genuinely useful, extractable content. That's structure work and writing work — not a markup product.
What about financing claims in ads?
Regulation Z is specific. Under 12 CFR 1026.24(d), stating any of four triggering terms in an ad — a downpayment amount or percentage, the number of payments or period of repayment, a payment amount, or a finance-charge amount — requires additional disclosures, including the APR. We check every financing figure against that list before it runs, and we log the check.
“Award-winning” websites?
Here is our precise wording, because precision is the point: we searched for an independent award program for US residential-trade or independent auto-repair websites and found none — only agency self-published “best websites” listicles, and general web awards honoring roofing manufacturers. We don't claim awards that don't exist, and we'd ask any agency claiming one to name the program.
So what do you actually bill for?
The work that still exists and still compounds: fast pages, answer-first structure, facts with primary sources, a named author, visible dates, honest measurement. That's what real GEO work looks like — and you can inspect our work yourself, scores and dates included.
In August 2026 we measured 32 agency sites. Eleven of the 25 agencies in that set were still selling or prescribing retired schema. We re-checked all eleven on 2026-08-28: eight are unchanged, one has fixed its page, and two now block us. (Our measurement; the method is available on request.)
Three commitments you can hold us to
- If Google retires a feature we've billed for, we tell you in that month's report and stop billing it.
- Every “what's dead” claim on this page links Google's own page, not our opinion.
- We put this list in front of every prospect before they sign — including the ones another agency is quoting.
If you want someone to sell you FAQ schema anyway, there are agencies who will. We're not one of them.
Published · Updated — the updated date on this page dates the policy citations above.
How we compare
We publish measured, dated comparisons — including the things each competitor does well: Hook Agency, RYNO / Blue Corona, Thrive, Scorpion, and Contractor Webmasters.
Sources
- Google Search Central changelog — checked 2026-08-28
- Google Search Central changelog — checked 2026-08-28
- Google Search Central — checked 2026-08-28
- Google Search Central — checked 2026-08-28
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — checked 2026-08-28
- Google Search Central blog — How-to and FAQ changes — checked 2026-08-28
Every number on this page links a primary source or names our own measurement with its date. How we write.